J. Manjeesee and Another v Zimbabwe Open University

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the disciplinary committee was properly constituted in terms of the Z.O.U Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Disciplinary committee composition did not follow Section 25 of Z.O.U Act"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Act supersedes the Z.O.U Act in disciplinary matters","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent used National Code instead of Z.O.U Act provisions"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in placing onus of proving password tampering on appellants","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Passwords were encrypted and belonged to appellants"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the evidence used to convict appellants was sufficient","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Evidence related to password access and mark alterations"}

Background