terminal benefits computationcash in lieu of leaveovertime paymentfixed term contracts
Tags
terminal benefitsfixed term contractovertimeleave pay
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
–
t
h
e
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
i
s
e
n
t
i
r
e
l
y
c
o
m
m
o
n
-
l
a
w
d
r
i
v
e
n
;
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
q
u
o
t
e
d
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
e
d
.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in calculating cash in lieu of leave","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"First appellant claimed 60 days leave without evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in calculating overtime payment","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First appellant claimed overtime from 2009-2013 without evidence"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The two appellants were employed on fixed term contracts by Foodworld. After termination, disputes arose over computation of terminal benefits including cash in lieu of leave and overtime payment. The matter went to arbitration where awards were made in favor of the employees.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases