agreement of salebreachcancellationimmovable propertydomicilium citandi et executandi
Tags
property sale agreementbreach of contractcancellationspecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
None – no statute or codal provision is referred to in the reasons.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was in breach of the agreement of sale","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Failure to pay within 30 days, unauthorized sale of stands"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the cancellation of the agreement was valid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Service of notice on domicilium, failure to remedy breach"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant entered into an agreement of sale for immovable property but breached by failing to pay the purchase price within 30 days and by selling subdivided stands without authority. The respondent cancelled the agreement after giving 14 days notice to remedy the breach, which the applicant failed to do.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases