water supplydisconnectionstatutory bodymandament van spolieUrban Councils Act
Tags
water disconnectionmandament van spolielocal governmentutility services
legislation
Statutes Cited
Urban Councils Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent acted lawfully in disconnecting water supply for non-payment","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's non-payment of bills, 24-hour notice given, billing based on estimates"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant established a prima facie case for mandament van spolie relief","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged unlawful dispossession of water supply"}
{"issue_text":"Whether billing based on estimates is lawful under the applicable regulations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant denied access to meter readers, billing done on estimates"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a resident of Harare, sought urgent relief against the respondent municipality for disconnecting her water supply. She alleged the disconnection was unlawful and sought reconnection and damages. The respondent admitted disconnection but claimed it was lawful due to non-payment of water bills.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases