stay of criminal proceedingsdirect access applicationconstitutional jurisdictionreview powersgross irregularity
Tags
urgent applicationstay of proceedingsdirect accesscriminal proceedingsconstitutional jurisdiction
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitutional Court Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Does the Constitutional Court have jurisdiction to stay unterminated criminal proceedings pending determination of applications for direct access?","issue_type":"procedural/constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Direct access applications pending, criminal proceedings ongoing"}
{"issue_text":"Do applications for direct access constitute constitutional matters that trigger the Court's review jurisdiction?","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of direct access applications"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, who are facing criminal charges under s 31(a)(i) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, sought to stay the criminal proceedings pending determination of their applications for direct access to the Constitutional Court. They had previously requested the magistrate to refer constitutional questions to the Constitutional Court under s 175(4) of the Constitution, which request was dismissed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases