Grade 10 placementPrescriptionContinuing unfair labour practiceSection 94 Labour Act
Tags
MisgradingPrescriptionContinuing unfair labour practice
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Designated Agent erred in ruling that the appellants' claim had prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim brought 8-9 years after cause of action arose; appellants still in Grade 11"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the misgrading constituted a continuing unfair labour practice exempt from prescription","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants still employed in Grade 11 when matter referred"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellants who were transferred from Zinwa to City of Harare and placed in Grade 11 instead of Grade 10 brought a claim 9 years later. The Designated Agent ruled the claim had prescribed. Appellants appealed, arguing the misgrading was a continuing unfair labour practice.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases