Constitutional obligationPresidential discretionAppointment processProsecutor-GeneralJudicial Service Commission
Tags
Constitutional obligationPresidential appointmentProsecutor-GeneralJudicial Service Commission
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Administrative Justice Act
Civil Evidence Act
Constitutional Court Rules, 2016
Constitutional Court Rules, 2016
Constitutional Court Rules, 2016
High Court Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the President has a constitutional obligation to provide reasons for rejecting nominees","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"President rejected first list without reasons"}
{"issue_text":"Whether fresh interviews must be conducted before submitting a second list","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No interviews before second list"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring this application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant brought application as citizen"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant challenged the President's appointment of the fifth respondent as Prosecutor-General, alleging that the President failed to fulfil constitutional obligations by not providing reasons for rejecting the first list of nominees and by not requiring fresh interviews before the second list was submitted.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases