Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Constitutional Court

Joyce Teurai Ropa Mujuru v The President of Zimbabwe & 5 Ors

[2018] ZWCCZ 8

Case Details

Court
Constitutional Court
Date
15 February 2018
Citation
[2018] ZWCCZ 8
Judgment No.
CCZ 8/18
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
CHIDYAUSIKU CJ
Author
GARWE JCC
Full Bench
CHIDYAUSIKU CJMALABA DCJGWAUNZA JCCGARWE JCCHLATSHWAYO JCCPATEL JCCGUVAVA JCCMAVANGIRA JCCUCHENA JCC
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) ActSection 167(2) ConstitutionSection 85(1) ConstitutionBond Notes RegulationsConstitutional Challenge
Tags
Presidential PowersConstitutional ObligationsBond NotesDelegation of Powers
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Act
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant properly approached the court under s 167(2)(d) of the Constitution instead of s 85(1)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sought declarations of constitutional obligation failures rather than alleging rights violations"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the President and Parliament failed to fulfil constitutional obligations regarding the Presidential Powers Act","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant alleged President should not have used Act and Parliament should have repealed it"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant challenged the constitutionality of Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) (Amendment of Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe Act and Issue of Bond Notes) Regulations, 2016 (SI 133/2016) issued by the President under the Presidential Powers (Temporary Measures) Act. She approached the court under s 167(2)(d) of the Constitution alleging that the President and Parliament failed to fulfil constitutional obligations, rather than under s 85(1) alleging violation of her fundamental rights.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →