fixed term contractseffluxion of timeleave dayssalary underpaymentarbitration appeal
Tags
fixed term contractscontract terminationleave pay claimssalary reduction
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Amendment Act No. 5 of 2015
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellants' contracts were unlawfully terminated","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contracts were 3-month fixed term, expired June 2015, not renewed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellants proved non-payment of leave days","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants failed to specify which leave days, respondent provided proof of payment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was underpayment of salaries","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants refused to sign new contracts with lower salaries"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Four employees appealed against an arbitral award that found their contracts were lawfully terminated by effluxion of time, their leave pay claims were unproven, and there was no salary underpayment. The employees had been on three-month fixed term contracts which expired in June 2015 and were not renewed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases