arbitrationinternational commercial arbitrationnatural justiceaudi alteram partem
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (1985, as amended)
Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral tribunal violated natural justice principles by determining special pleas and making an award without affording parties opportunity to be heard","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Special pleas filed, award made without hearing, tribunal sought legal counsel"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant waived right to object under article 4 of Model Law","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant participated in arbitration, paid tribunal fees"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court has jurisdiction to set aside interlocutory arbitral decision","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Award dismissed special pleas but merits still pending"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Kadoma City Council applied to set aside an arbitral award made by three arbitrators, arguing that the tribunal violated natural justice principles by determining special pleas (res judicata, jurisdiction, and prescription) and proceeding to make an award on the merits without affording the parties an opportunity to be heard on the preliminary issues.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases