Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Kasimboti Trading (Private) Limited & 3 Ors v ZB Bank Limited

[2019] ZWSC 98

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
26 November 2019
Citation
[2019] ZWSC 98
Judgment No.
SC 98/19
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MAKARAU JA
Full Bench
MAKARAU JAHLATSHWAYO JAUCHENA JA
Areas of Law
Banking LawCivil ProcedureEvidence Law
Keywords
Default judgmentInterest calculationWithout prejudice ruleRule 449Res judicata
Tags
BankingDefault judgmentInterest overchargeWithout prejudice correspondence
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether a \"without prejudice\" letter containing a promise to verify interest calculations is admissible in evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Bank's letter dated 3 April 2017 promising to verify interest"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appellants were entitled to an order compelling debatement of the account or crediting of overcharged interest","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged overcharge of US$25,266.13, bank's refusal to verify"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the relief sought was an attempt to revisit the default judgment","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Default judgment entered in 2015, new application filed in 2017"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellants had a credit facility with ZB Bank. After default judgment was entered against them for US$151,981.23 capital debt plus interest and charges, they discovered two years later that interest had been overcharged by US$25,266.13. The bank had promised in a "without prejudice" letter to verify the interest calculations but later refused, claiming the matter was res judicata.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →