{"issue_text":"Whether the defendant is vicariously liable for assault by soldiers on the plaintiff","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Soldiers were members of Zimbabwe National Army; soldiers assaulted plaintiff"}
{"issue_text":"Whether soldiers who assaulted plaintiff were seconded under POSA section 37","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Soldiers wore red berets; Major Munyengeri's contingent wore green helmets"}
{"issue_text":"What quantum of damages is appropriate for fractured ulna","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff sustained fractured ulna; economic conditions in Zimbabwe"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff claimed damages for assault by Zimbabwe National Army soldiers who broke into her home, assaulted her and her husband, causing her a fractured ulna. The defendant denied liability arguing soldiers were seconded to police under POSA.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases