Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Kingstone Mudonhi v Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others; Ticharwa Murehwa v Minister of Mines and Mining Development and Others

HH 713-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
31 October 2018
Citation
HH 713-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 713
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
TAGU J
Full Bench
TAGU J
Areas of Law
Administrative lawMining law
Keywords
Mining claimsBoundary disputeAdministrative justiceUltra vires
Tags
Mining disputesBoundary disputesAdministrative review
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • 1
  • 9
  • 5
  • 0
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 6
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • f
  • o
  • r
  • m
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the first and second respondents acted unlawfully in reviewing their own decision without consulting the applicants","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants not consulted; 22 May 2017 decision altered boundaries"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second respondent had jurisdiction to review his own decision under the Mines and Minerals Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No provision for review in Act; decision made under section 341(2)"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the decision violated the applicants' rights to administrative justice","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No hearing given; bias alleged"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants and third respondent are gold miners with adjacent mining claims in Odzi. A boundary dispute arose in 2014, with the second respondent making a determination on 23 December 2014. In July 2016, the third respondent requested review of this decision, leading to a new determination on 22 May 2017 that altered boundaries to the applicants' detriment without consulting them.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →