property salepurchase price refundprescriptionagreement of saletransfer of property
Tags
property salebreach of contractprescription
legislation
Statutes Cited
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Cause of action arose when plaintiff learned of sale to Cosmas"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant received payment from plaintiff for the stand","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's testimony of payment, defendant's admission in previous proceedings"}
{"issue_text":"Amount paid by plaintiff and currency thereof","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Agreement specified US dollars, legal tender in 2012"}
{"issue_text":"Whether defendant is obliged to refund money received","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant failed to transfer property and sold to third party"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff purchased a stand from the defendant in December 2012 for US$27,000 and paid the full purchase price. The defendant failed to transfer the property and instead sold it to a third party. After an unsuccessful application to be declared owner, the plaintiff sued for refund of the purchase price.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases