{"issue_text":"What constitutes reasonable access to the children","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's work in South Africa, children's schooling"}
{"issue_text":"What constitutes fair maintenance for the children","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Defendant's income, children's needs, both parents' capacity"}
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff entitled to post-divorce spousal maintenance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's capacity to work, savings, defendant's means"}
{"issue_text":"What should happen to the matrimonial home","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Children residing there, defendant's other properties"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 2009 and had two children. They agreed the marriage had irretrievably broken down. The plaintiff sought custody, maintenance for children and herself, and rights to the matrimonial home. The defendant opposed spousal maintenance and sought to retain all property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases