{"issue_text":"Whether the appeal was fatally defective due to late filing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appeal filed on 2 July 2013, dismissal letter served 5 June 2013"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was guilty of disobeying a lawful order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant refused painting instruction, painting not in contract, defective protective equipment"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed as a binner since 2006, was dismissed for refusing to paint various items when instructed to do so, claiming the duty was outside his contract and protective equipment was defective. He appealed to the Labour Court after both disciplinary and appeals committees upheld his dismissal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases