{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in not setting aside the arbitral award","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award found force majeure due to RBZ refusal"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in registering the arbitral award","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award upheld termination of agreement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a foreign hospitality management company, entered into a management agreement with the first respondent, a Zimbabwean hotel company, in 2015. The agreement required exchange control approval. After initial approval for one year, the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe refused to renew approval, leading to termination of the agreement. The dispute went to arbitration, where the arbitrator ruled in favor of the first respondent, finding force majeure. The appellant sought to set aside the arbitral award in the High Court, which dismissed the application and registered the award instead.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases