Public prosecutorsAdministrative justiceConstitutional powersDelegation of authority
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Administrative Justice Act
Labour Act
Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Attorney-General's withdrawal of prosecuting authority from public prosecutors was lawful and procedurally fair","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Attorney-General withdrew authority without individual responses from applicants"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the Attorney-General's decision","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondents raised jurisdiction objection based on Labour Act"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Five public prosecutors who were executive committee members of Zimbabwe Law Officers Association (ZILOA) participated in a work stoppage in October 2011. The Attorney-General demanded written explanations for their conduct, which they refused to provide individually. The Attorney-General then withdrew their authority to prosecute and referred them to the Public Service Commission for further processing. The applicants challenged this action as unlawful and unfair.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases