Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Lloyd Munyaradzi Manokore v Perkins Zhawari and Lillian Zhawari

HH 378-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
29 June 2021
Citation
HH 378-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 378
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
CHIRAWU-MUGOMBA J
Full Bench
CHIRAWU-MUGOMBA J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureProperty LawLegal Practitioner Conduct
Keywords
condonationrule 49service of noticeappearance to defendpower of attorneyproperty sale
Tags
condonationservice of processlegal practitioner misconductproperty sale
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant should be granted condonation for late service of notice of entry of appearance to defend","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Notice served 4 days late; over 3 year delay in seeking condonation"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has reasonable prospects of success on the merits","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"LPDT findings of invalid power of attorney and misconduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, a legal practitioner, sought condonation for late service of notice of entry of appearance to defend in a matter where respondents sought to set aside a property sale conducted by his firm. The notice was served 4 days late due to a messenger's omission, and the applicant only sought condonation after being barred in the main matter three years later.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →