Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

LLYOD MUTETWA versus LISSY WASARIREVU

HH 93-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
18 February 2025
Citation
HH 93-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 93
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MUSITHU J
Full Bench
MUSITHU J
Areas of Law
Family LawProperty Law
Keywords
evictioncustomary unionmatrimonial homeproperty ownershipunjustified enrichment
Tags
evictioncustomary marriagematrimonial propertyproperty rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971 (as amended)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent is entitled to remain in occupation of property despite being non-owner","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sole owner, respondent claims matrimonial property rights"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether respondent's alleged contributions create enforceable right against eviction","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent claims direct/indirect contributions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, sole registered owner of a property in Harare, sought eviction of his former customary law wife following termination of their union in June 2022. The respondent opposed eviction claiming the property was matrimonial property to which she had contributed and was entitled to share.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →