Lola Verlaque and Edward Verlaque v Chester Mhende and Mary Anne Mhende and Moses Hungwe Chinhengo N.O.
Chester Mhende and Mary Anne Mhende v Lola Verlaque and Edward Verlaque
arbitrationsetting aside arbitral awardregistration of arbitral awardjoint venture agreementdamages
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for violating public policy by awarding damages without evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Damages awarded based on notional figures; no evidence of actual production or sales; no mitigation evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application for registration of the arbitral award should be granted","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Dependent on outcome of setting aside application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants and first/second respondents entered into a joint venture agreement for farming operations on Kwayedza Farm. Disputes arose, leading to arbitration. The arbitrator awarded damages to the first/second respondents based on notional calculations without evidence. The applicants sought to set aside the arbitral award for violating public policy by awarding damages without evidence.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases