Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Lovemore Kanjanda and 4 Others v Suraj Mining

[2025] ZWLC 2025

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
5 March 2025
Citation
[2025] ZWLC 2025
Judgment No.
LC/H//2025
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Review

Bench

Presiding
G. Musariri
Full Bench
G. Musariri
Areas of Law
Labour LawEmployment ContractReview Procedure
Keywords
Section 89(1)(d) Labour ActDesignated AgentTerminal BenefitsBiasOmission of Party
Tags
ReviewDesignated Agent DeterminationTerminal Benefits
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act Chapter 28:01
  • Labour Act Chapter 28:01
  • Labour Act Chapter 28:01
  • Labour Act Chapter 28:01
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Designated Agent showed bias by acting as respondent's messenger","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants' allegation that DA was messenger for all correspondences"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the omission of Peter Mareya from the determination constitutes a reviewable irregularity","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"DA determined matter with 4 instead of 5 applicants"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Five employees applied to a Designated Agent for terminal benefits and other employment-related claims. The Designated Agent issued a determination dismissing their claims and omitted one applicant (Peter Mareya) from the determination. The applicants sought review of this determination alleging bias and procedural irregularities.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →