Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Loveness Sengeredo v Eric Cable N.O.

HH 32-08

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
2 April 2008
Citation
HH 32-08
Neutral Citation
[2008] ZWHH 32
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Makarau JP
Full Bench
Makarau JP
Areas of Law
Civil procedureContempt of courtExecution of court orders
Keywords
Contempt of courtCivil executionCourt order complianceMobile phone handsetMotor vehicle
Tags
Contempt of courtExecution of court ordersCivil procedure
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • w
  • a
  • s
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • m
  • p
  • t
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether contempt proceedings are competent where there is a dispute as to whether the court order can be complied with","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Dispute over possession of mobile phone handset"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant proved willful non-compliance with court order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's belief that applicant already had handset"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant obtained a court order on 12 September 2006 against Africa International Removals for payment of $4,441,841.67 plus interest, delivery of a vehicle and mobile phone. After partial compliance, the applicant sought contempt proceedings against the respondent for failure to deliver the mobile phone handset, claiming it was in the respondent's possession.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →