Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Luckboy Vudzi v Doctor S Zeidan

HH 120-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
2017
Citation
HH 120-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 120
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
ZHOU J
Full Bench
ZHOU J
Areas of Law
Contract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
absolution from the instanceevidencereasonable mistake testservices agreement
Tags
contract disputeservices renderedinternet café business
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • c
  • a
  • s
  • e
  • w
  • a
  • s
  • d
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • d
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • c
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • o
  • n
  • l
  • a
  • w
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • p
  • l
  • e
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • c
  • i
  • v
  • i
  • l
  • p
  • r
  • o
  • c
  • e
  • d
  • u
  • r
  • e
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether there is evidence upon which a reasonable court might find for the plaintiff","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's evidence contradicted by documents showing him as business owner"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case requiring the defendant to respond","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contradictory evidence regarding business ownership"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff claimed payment for services rendered in setting up an internet café business, alleging the defendant requested these services. The defendant denied any agreement for services and counterclaimed that he had loaned money to the plaintiff for the business. All equipment was purchased in the plaintiff's name and his company name.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →