Luke Hasha v Minister of State for National Security in the President's Office N.O. and Department of State for National Security, Central Intelligence Organisation and Director General Central Intelligence Organisation N.O.

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant proved he was formally appointed to act as Divisional Intelligence Officer","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's claim of acting appointment, lack of formal appointment documentation, retrospective payment of acting allowance"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent's failure to determine the appeal within reasonable time violated administrative justice","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appeal filed 17 August 2016, no determination for nearly a year, Code provides 14 working days for response"}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to be confirmed as substantive Divisional Intelligence Officer based on acting period","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Acting period of over 6 months, Code provisions on confirmation, lack of formal appointment"}

Background