M Bhika Brothers (Private) Limited t/a BK Investments versus Nerveway Trading (Private) Limited and Teriket Investments (Private) Limited and Tutsan Trading (Private) Limited and Ray Makuvatsine (Private Business Corp)
Arbitral award enforcementPublic policyLease terminationHolding over damagesCertification of documents
Tags
ArbitrationEnforcement of arbitral awardPublic policyLease agreementTermination of lease
legislation
Statutes Cited
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant complied with Article 35(2) of the UNCITRAL Model Law by providing a duly certified copy of the arbitral award.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Certification by Wisdom Vhudzijena; tendering of original award"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent was properly represented in the proceedings.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"False affidavit by Tawanda Nhengu; CR14 showing he was not a director"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the second respondent properly opposed the registration of the award.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Reliance on third respondent’s affidavit without cross-verification"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award offends public policy due to reversal of onus of proof.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Burden of proving existence of BK Investments (Pvt) Ltd"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the award offends public policy because the fourth respondent was allowed to remain while others were evicted despite similar occupation.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Different lease terms; fourth respondent’s lease lacked clause 8"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator failed to apply his mind to the scope of renovations and their impact on ground floor tenants.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Quotation from AM Machado; location of renovations"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the notice to terminate was invalid for failing to cite clause 8 of the lease agreement.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Content of notices; clause 8(d) on deemed acceptance"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, owner of Silke House in Harare, sought registration of an arbitral award confirming termination of lease agreements with the first three respondents who refused to vacate after notice. The arbitrator had ordered the respondents to vacate within 14 days and pay holding over damages. The second and third respondents applied to set aside the award, while the first respondent was improperly represented. The fourth respondent was not affected by the award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases