M.P KRUGER (PRIVATE) LIMITED and DR MUNYARADZI KEREKE versus THE MINISTER OF LANDS, AGRICULTURE, WATER AND RURAL RESETTLEMENT N.O and SECOND TO SIXTY-SEVEN RESPONDENTS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE ATTACHED TO THE NOTICE OF APPLICATION
Compulsory acquisitionIndigenous ZimbabweanSection 72 ConstitutionLand reform programmeAgricultural land
Tags
Land reformConstitutional reviewAgricultural land acquisitionIndigenous ownership
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
High Court Act
Administrative Justice Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court has jurisdiction to review compulsory acquisition of agricultural land from indigenous Zimbabweans under section 72 of the Constitution","issue_type":"procedural/constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Land owned by indigenous Zimbabwean acquired for settlement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether indigenous ownership exempts agricultural land from compulsory acquisition under the land reform programme","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Second applicant is indigenous Zimbabwean"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants challenged the compulsory acquisition of their farm by the State for agricultural settlement purposes, arguing that as indigenous Zimbabweans their land could not be acquired under the Constitution's land reform provisions. The first respondent raised preliminary points on jurisdiction and locus standi.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases