None – the judgment is entirely common-law driven; no Labour Act sections or regulations are quoted.
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the employer-employee relationship subsists or was terminated by resignation","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent went on leave September 2013; last communication March 2014; respondent claims told not to report October 2013"}
{"issue_text":"Whether respondent is entitled to be paid arrear salaries and the quantum thereof","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Salary $700/month; period October 2013 to February 2016; arbitrator awarded up to March 2014"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding March 2014 as termination date","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarded up to March 2014; respondent claims ongoing employment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether damages for unfair loss of employment should have been 4 months or 24 months","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator awarded 4 months ($2,800); respondent claims 24 months ($16,800)"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed as Camp Manager by the appellant from 1 April 2012 on $700 salary. A dispute arose over whether he resigned in September 2013 or was unlawfully dismissed. The arbitrator found unlawful dismissal and awarded $10,900. Both parties appealed - the appellant against the dismissal finding, the respondent claiming the award was too low.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases