{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal properly raise questions of law as required for appeals against arbitral awards","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The three grounds of appeal challenge factual findings of the arbitrator"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding an employment relationship existed","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appointment letter, memorandum, correspondence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in quantifying salaries without evidence","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No evidence led on salary quantification"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the finding that respondent earned $1,500 monthly salary was unsupported by evidence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No payslip or evidence of $1,500 salary"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitral award that found an employment relationship existed between the parties, awarded salary arrears and notice pay, and directed negotiation of a termination package. The appeal raised three grounds challenging the arbitrator's findings on employment status and salary quantification.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases