Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Manica Boards & Doors (Private) Limited v Kudakwashe Pisirai

[2013] ZWLC 31

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
11 October 2013
Citation
[2013] ZWLC 31
Judgment No.
LC/MC/31/13
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
G Musariri
Full Bench
G Musariri
Areas of Law
Employment lawContract interpretation
Keywords
Motor vehicle policyCompany carResignationArbitration award
Tags
Motor vehicle policyCompany car benefitResignation benefits
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • N
  • o
  • s
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • s
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • c
  • i
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • o
  • r
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • h
  • i
  • s
  • j
  • u
  • d
  • g
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • .
  • T
  • h
  • e
  • d
  • i
  • s
  • p
  • u
  • t
  • e
  • c
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • e
  • d
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • r
  • e
  • l
  • y
  • o
  • n
  • i
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • r
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • t
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • a
  • p
  • r
  • i
  • v
  • a
  • t
  • e
  • c
  • o
  • n
  • t
  • r
  • a
  • c
  • t
  • u
  • a
  • l
  • d
  • o
  • c
  • u
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • (
  • t
  • h
  • e
  • M
  • o
  • t
  • o
  • r
  • V
  • e
  • h
  • i
  • c
  • l
  • e
  • P
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • y
  • )
  • .
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator correctly interpreted the motor vehicle policy regarding entitlement to purchase company car upon resignation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent resigned after 4 years in Grade E1; policy paragraphs 11.5 and 11.6"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant employed the respondent as Human Resources Manager from 2007. Upon resignation in May 2011, the respondent claimed entitlement to purchase the company car he had used for 4 years under the company's motor vehicle policy. The arbitrator ruled in the respondent's favour, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →