Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Manifest Security (Private) Limited v ZESA Holdings (Private) Limited

HH 18-24

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
15 January 2024
Citation
HH 18-24
Neutral Citation
[2024] ZWHH 18
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Musithu J
Full Bench
Musithu J
Areas of Law
Commercial LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
arbitration clausedomestic transactioncurrency denominationspecial plea
Tags
contract disputebreach of contractarbitration clausecurrency regulations
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether clause 17 arbitration clause ousts court jurisdiction","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clause 17 uses \"may give notice\" language"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff's claim denominated in US dollars is competent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Statutory Instrument 212 of 2019 requires domestic transactions in Zimbabwe dollars"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff provided security services to defendant under a contract for 11 sites but defendant only assigned 5 sites, allegedly breaching the contract. Plaintiff claimed US$36,660 damages for the 6 unassigned sites. Defendant raised special pleas challenging jurisdiction due to arbitration clause and competence of claim due to currency denomination.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →