Marange Resources (Private) Limited v Core Mining and Minerals (Private) Limited (In Liquidation) and Moses Chinhengo, (Retired Judge) N.O and President of the Law Society of Zimbabwe N.O and Attorney General of Zimbabwe N.O
{"issue_text":"Whether the first respondent was properly cited given the misdescription from (Pty) to (Pvt)","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent is South African company cited as Zimbabwean company"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application is urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed long after arbitration process began"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant exhausted domestic remedies under the Arbitration Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator has power to rule on jurisdiction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought an urgent interim interdict to stay arbitration proceedings initiated by the first respondent, arguing that the arbitration agreement was invalid and that the first respondent was improperly cited as it was a South African (Pty) company incorrectly described as a Zimbabwean (Pvt) company. The first respondent had been placed under liquidation by a South African court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases