{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was in peaceful and undisturbed possession of the tuck shop","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant had leased premises since 2011, had access during school terms"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondents' actions constituted unlawful spoliation","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Installation of additional locks, public barring of customers"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a tuck shop constitutes commercial premises under the regulations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant conducted business from tuck shop under lease"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant operated a tuck shop at Gateway Primary School under a lease agreement with the Parents Association. After receiving notice of lease termination, she continued to occupy the premises. The respondents installed additional locks on the tuck shop and barred students from buying there, allegedly depriving her of peaceful possession.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases