Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Markos Athitakis v Kate Bronwyn Worsley-Woswick

HH 536-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
5 August 2022
Citation
HH 536-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 536
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MUCHAWA J
Full Bench
MUCHAWA JWAMAMBO J
Areas of Law
Family LawChild Access
Keywords
supervised accessequal accessvideo callsbest interests of child
Tags
child accessparental rightssupervision
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in granting supervised access without finding it necessary for child's best interests","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Child's burns incident, probation officer's report"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in not granting equal access","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Previous equal access, changed living arrangements"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in not granting video and voice call access","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's travel, respondent's non-opposition"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The parties, who were never married, had a daughter Leia Maria Athitakis born 21 November 2018. After their relationship ended, they initially agreed on equal unsupervised access. Following an incident where the child suffered minor burns while in appellant's care, respondent imposed supervised access. Appellant appealed against the supervised access order.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →