Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Marlborough Civic Centre Owners Association v David Mazambara

LC/H/356/25

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
1 October 2025
Citation
LC/H/356/25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWLC 356
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L.M. Murasi
Full Bench
L.M. Murasi
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment contractsJurisdiction
Keywords
Designated AgentNEC Commercial SectorsBuilding caretakingJurisdictionAppeal
Tags
unfair labour practicejurisdictionbuilding caretakingcommercial sectors
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Did the Designated Agent have jurisdiction to determine the matter given that appellant's business is building caretaking?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's business is building caretaking; Statutory Instrument 45/93 defines commercial sectors"}
  • {"issue_text":"Should amounts collected by respondent from tenants be set off against salary shortfalls?","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent collected money from tenants; appellant failed to pay salaries"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The respondent was employed as a caretaker by the appellant association. He reported an unfair labour practice dispute which was referred to the NEC for Commercial Sectors. The Designated Agent found in favour of the respondent, determining the appellant's business fell within commercial sectors jurisdiction. The appellant appealed, arguing the Designated Agent lacked jurisdiction and that money collected by respondent from tenants should offset any salary shortfalls.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →