due inquiryconsent to sellestate propertybeneficiariesexecutorMaster of High Court
Tags
estate administrationadministrative justiceexecutor dutiesbeneficiary rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
Administration of Estates Act
Administrative Justice Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Master conducted due inquiry as required by section 120 of Administration of Estates Act before granting consent to sell estate property","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Master granted consent without hearing beneficiaries or considering alternatives"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Master's decision to allow sale of three farms for USD$700,000 to settle USD$14,047 liability was reasonable and fair","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Disproportionate sale price to liability ratio, alternative property available"}
{"issue_text":"Whether beneficiaries were entitled to be heard before the Master made his decision","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Beneficiaries objected but were not consulted"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The Master of the High Court granted consent to an executor to sell three farms by private treaty to settle estate liabilities of USD$14,047. The beneficiaries objected, proposing instead to sell a butchery in Kwekwe. The High Court set aside the Master's consent, finding he failed to conduct due inquiry. Three appeals were lodged against this decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases