{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant had locus standi to sue the respondent for commission based on stipulatio alteri doctrine","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant not party to contract; clause 6.1 wording; no acceptance by appellant"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Appellant estate agent prepared sale agreement between seller and respondent purchaser, inserting clause providing for commission payment. When respondent cancelled agreement, appellant sued for commission relying on stipulatio alteri doctrine. High Court held appellant lacked locus standi. Supreme Court dismissed appeal, finding no intention to make appellant party to contract.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases