Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Maxess Marketing (Pvt) Ltd v Shaillon Chiswa

HH 183-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
20 March 2025
Citation
HH 183-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 183
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Takuva J
Full Bench
Takuva J
Areas of Law
Property LawContract LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
agreement of salecancellationprescriptionspecific performanceinstalment saleContractual Penalties Act
Tags
contract cancellationprescriptioninstalment salespecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Contractual Penalties Act
  • Prescription Act
  • Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the contract had prescribed by the time of cancellation","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Settlement became due 3 August 2019; cancellation 9 December 2022; respondent acknowledged debt"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the cancellation notice complied with the Contractual Penalties Act","issue_type":"legal","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Initial 7-day notice; rectified to 30 days on 24 October 2022"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought confirmation of cancellation of an agreement of sale for immovable property after the respondent failed to pay the balance of the purchase price by the agreed deadline. The respondent had paid US$489,000 of the US$800,000 purchase price, leaving a balance of US$311,000. The applicant initially gave a 7-day notice of breach, later rectified to 30 days, before cancelling the contract. The respondent disputed the cancellation and claimed the contract had prescribed, while acknowledging the debt.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →