{"issue_text":"Whether the bank is vicariously liable for fraudulent withdrawal by its employee Murape","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Murape was bank employee who fraudulently withdrew funds; Murape was not authorized to solicit foreign currency sales; Transaction was between Murape and third party Tapiwa"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the bank was negligent in honoring the withdrawal despite insufficient funds","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Withdrawal slip lacked balance endorsement; Bank had 70% fool-proof system; Transaction processed despite account deficiency"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff operated a foreign currency account with the defendant bank. A bank employee, Murape, fraudulently withdrew US$5,000 from the plaintiff's account using a signed but incomplete withdrawal slip. The plaintiff sued the bank for vicarious liability and negligence, claiming US$2,304.79.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases