{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant's dismissal for misconduct was justified","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant violated section 4(a) and 4(b) of S.I.15/06; Appellant failed to submit required report"}
{"issue_text":"Whether suspension of appellant constituted unlawful \"forced leave\"","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant was suspended during disciplinary process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator erred in proceeding without considering mitigation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No record of mitigation before arbitrator"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was dismissed from employment for misconduct including wilful disobedience to lawful orders and conduct inconsistent with his employment contract. An arbitrator upheld the dismissal based on written submissions. The appellant appealed, challenging the dismissal and claiming he was sent on "forced leave."
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases