{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding overtime payment of $9,477 when not proved on balance of probabilities","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent worked excess hours but was not paid overtime"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding back pay from June 2012 to March 2013 when no constructive dismissal was found","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent left employment due to unbearable acts but no constructive dismissal was found"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding leave pay of $783 when leave days were granted","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent's entitlement to cash in lieu of leave"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is defective as it is against a non-existent entity","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Whether Mazarura Store and Mazarura Bus Service & Stores (Pvt) Ltd are the same entity"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Respondent Sumali Dinner was employed by Mazarura Store as a watchman from 8 February 2008 to June 2012. He worked during holidays and excess hours but was not paid overtime. He left employment due to unbearable acts by the appellant. The matter was referred for arbitration on 30 August 2012.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases