Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Meikles Limited v Infra Structure Development Bank of Zimbabwe and The Sheriff of Zimbabwe

HH 376-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
14 June 2017
Citation
HH 376-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 376
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
CHIGUMBA J
Full Bench
CHIGUMBA J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCommercial LawInterdicts
Keywords
stay of executionconsent orderurgencyinterdictshares attachment
Tags
urgent applicationstay of executionconsent judgmentinterdict
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application meets requirements for urgency","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay in bringing application, multiple execution attempts, pending set-aside application"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether stay of execution should be granted pending determination of set-aside application","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Pending application to set aside consent judgment, risk of irreparable harm, balance of convenience"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant has established requirements for interim interdict","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Clear right, apprehended injury, no alternative remedy"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Meikles Limited obtained a consent judgment against it in HC 9880/15 for USD$3.6 million plus interest. When IDBZ attempted execution, Meikles applied to set aside the consent judgment under HC 11886/16. While that application was pending, IDBZ renewed execution attempts, prompting Meikles to bring this urgent application for a stay of execution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →