{"issue_text":"Whether section 18 of the Labour Amendment Act No 5 of 2015 violates sections 56(1) and 3(2)(k) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Retrospective application to terminations on or after 17 July 2015"}
{"issue_text":"Whether section 93(5) of the Labour Act violates sections 68(1), 69(2) and 169(1) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Procedure makes labour officer an interested party and removes right of appeal"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a labour officer, had ruled that two former employees of the respondent were entitled to compensation for loss of employment under section 12(4b) of the Labour Act. The respondent opposed confirmation of this ruling and filed a counter application seeking referral of constitutional issues regarding the retrospective application of the Labour Amendment Act No 5 of 2015 and the constitutionality of section 93(5) procedures.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases