{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have locus standi to seek review of a decision made in favor of other parties when they accept their own lawful exclusion","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants accepted their lawful exclusion from nomination"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the application complies with rule 62(2) of High Court Rules requiring exact relief to appear ex facie the application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application did not state exact relief sought on face of application"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the matter is urgent despite being filed nearly a month after the event","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application filed on 16 July 2023 for event of 21 June 2023"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicants, members of Elected Early Democrats political party, sought review of the second respondent's decision to accept nomination papers for first respondents after the 1600 hours deadline on 21 June 2023. The applicants had themselves failed to meet the same deadline and were lawfully excluded from nomination.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases