Review of arbitral awardDefault judgmentProcedural irregularity
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitrator Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an arbitrator must be joined as a party in review proceedings","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent objected to non-joinder of arbitrator"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a party seeking to set aside a default arbitral award must use rescission procedure rather than review","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award issued in default, applicant sought review"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Metropolitan Bank Ltd sought review of an arbitral award issued in default on 15 April 2016, claiming the oral hearing was conducted in its absence. The respondent raised preliminary points that the arbitrator should have been joined and that the applicant used the wrong procedure by seeking review instead of rescission of the default judgment.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases