{"issue_text":"Should the appellant's late filing of heads of argument be condoned?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant filed 102 days late; explained delay due to inability to pay attorney fees; appellant was dismissed from employment"}
{"issue_text":"Are grounds 1 and 2 of the appeal properly framed as appeal grounds or do they constitute review matters?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Ground 1 complains about denial of legal representation; Ground 2 complains about proceedings conducted in appellant's absence"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, Mhandu Badza, filed an appeal to the Labour Court against the Grain Marketing Board. She filed her heads of argument late, 30 July 2015 instead of within 14 days of receiving the respondent's response on 20 April 2015. The respondent raised two points in limine: that the appellant was barred for late filing, and that grounds 1 and 2 of the appeal improperly raised review matters rather than appeal issues.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases