Section 70 Police ActConstitutional invalidityPrescriptionAccess to courtsReferral procedure
Tags
Constitutional invalidityPolice ActPrescriptionAccess to courts
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Police Act
Prescription Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Minister has previously been, and is still properly, cited before this Court as the first respondent and whether this Court is properly seized with that matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Citation of Ministry vs Minister"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo had jurisdiction to entertain the constitutional issue raised by the applicants for the first time in supplementary heads of argument filed in the court a quo","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Constitutional challenge raised in ordinary civil proceedings"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Two army members were shot by police in July 2014. They sued for damages in June 2015. Respondents pleaded prescription under s 70 Police Act (8-month limit). Applicants challenged constitutionality of s 70 in supplementary heads. High Court declared s 70 unconstitutional and referred matter to Constitutional Court for confirmation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases