{"issue_text":"Whether the facts presented constitute \"new facts\" under section 116 (c) proviso (ii) CPEA","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Completion of investigations, apprehension of co-accused, co-accused granted bail"}
{"issue_text":"Whether compelling reasons exist to deny bail despite new facts","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Flight risk, strength of case, applicant's conduct"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant should be treated uniformly with co-accused who were granted bail","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Co-accused granted bail, different evidence strength, different post-incident conduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant sought bail for the third time after two previous failed applications, following an alleged axe murder on New Year's Day 2020. He claimed new facts existed: completed investigations, apprehended co-accused, and co-accused granted bail.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases