seizure ordermoney launderingproceeds of crimerescissioninterdict
Tags
property seizuremoney launderingrescission of judgmentinterdict
legislation
Statutes Cited
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
7
1
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
s
y
l
u
m
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
,
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
A
s
y
l
u
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
A
s
y
l
u
m
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
l
a
i
m
a
n
t
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
4
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
A
s
y
l
u
m
a
n
d
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
A
s
y
l
u
m
a
n
d
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
'
L
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
8
7
B
r
i
t
i
s
h
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
t
y
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
1
9
5
1
P
r
o
t
o
c
o
l
R
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
u
s
o
f
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
s
1
9
6
7
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
A
r
e
a
)
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
2
0
0
6
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
H
C
3
9
5
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
0
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
(
N
o
2
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
3
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
4
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
6
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
7
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
8
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
9
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
0
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
1
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
3
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
4
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
5
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
6
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
7
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
8
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
9
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
0
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
1
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
2
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
3
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
L
e
a
v
e
t
o
E
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
R
e
m
a
i
n
)
(
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
4
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the requirements for rescission of judgment under rule 29(1)(a) are met","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Order granted ex parte without service; alleged non-disclosure of prior judgment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants are entitled to a mandatory interdict for return of seized property","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged unlawful removal of property; expiry of retention period"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought rescission of a property seizure order granted ex parte on 12 November 2021 under the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act, and a mandatory interdict for return of seized property. The seizure order authorized investigation officers to seize gold mining plant and equipment from Rungs Investments' mining site and other equipment from a Harare address, pending investigations into alleged theft and money laundering.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases