{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's claim for paternity establishment and DNA testing has prescribed","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant born 1967, attained majority 1985, application filed 2019"}
{"issue_text":"Whether constitutional rights to family and paternity are subject to prescription","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"New constitution enacted 2013"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, aged 52, sought an order compelling his alleged half-siblings to undergo DNA testing to establish paternity and to register the late Madanlal Prag Vaghmaria as his biological father. The respondents opposed the application on grounds of prescription, arguing the claim arose 34 years ago when the applicant became a major.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases